When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the president of the partnership for the redevelopment and improvement project of the C Housing Redevelopment and the head of the partnership and the fifteen other members of the D, who want not to want redevelopment as a member of the above housing association, but to be liquidated in cash.

From June 16, 2016, 300 members, including 16 members including D, had been holding an explanatory meeting from around June 16, 2016 to 19:00 by inviting one lawyer and two chief secretary in the Incheon Gyeyang-gu apartment commercial building.

Since June 16, 2016, there is a part that does not comply with the attorney-at-law's explanation while hearing an explanatory meeting at the above explanatory place from around 19:20 on June 16, 2016

I think and tried to see.

Therefore, from around 19:40 to around 19:40, "Death and death shall be discarded in the middle of audience at the place of the meeting.

h. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ha

Accordingly, the audience displayed the shock machine in the Marier's electric shock, and the audience and the body fighting were conducted.

In addition, 300 members and 300 members left the meeting place and strike a presentation on cash settlement. In addition, 300 members and 300 members were able to leave the meeting place and participate in a presentation on cash settlement.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the law firm F's non-legal profession by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Submission of a transcript of suspect record and the submission of video evidence by the complainants);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The law firm F, who represented by the claimant D, etc., the respondent of this case, is well aware of such circumstances while receiving the application for parcelling-out for the redevelopment project for this redevelopment project by the C Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Cooperatives (hereinafter “the instant partnership”).