beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.11.09 2016고단285 (1)

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률위반( 공동 상해) 피고인은 2016. 2. 20. 22:00 경부터 같은 날 23:00 경 사이 공주시 D에 있는 ‘E 목장’ 내 주거용 건물에서, 속칭 ‘ 도리 짓고 땡’ 이라는 도박에 참여하였던 피해자 F(59 세) 이 선을 잡아 패를 돌리면서 그가 미리 준비해 온 화투로 바꿔 치기하려 다가 발각되고, 도박의 주재자인 G이 “ 이 새끼 죽여 버려 ”라고 소리치며 오른손으로 피해자의 목덜미를 잡고 왼손으로 얼굴을 수회 때리자, 이에 합세하여 H은 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수회 때리고, 피고인은 발로 피해자의 허벅지 부분을 2~3 회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant, together with G and H, inflicted injury on the victim, such as the inner section, cage cages, etc., which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant committed a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) on the same date and at the same place as that stated in paragraph 1, with G, H, and I, by opening money from the damaged person with G, H, and I on the basis of the fact that the damaged person booms itself.

Accordingly, the Defendant, along with G, led the victim to the main side of the building in question, and H and I sent the victim his head to the beds, and made the victim boom his head to the bed, and "the victim was fluent with the victim," and "G was fluent to the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation."

Fraud also provided money which people lose, which means that it would be able to pay the money and would be able to pay the money, and would not pay the money, and the victim would be detained and threatened as if it were to continue to exercise violence.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted and threatened the victim jointly with G, H, and I, and received KRW 9.10,00 from the person suffering from drinking frightage.

(i) the evidence;