특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
All appeals are dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental statements in the grounds of appeal filed by Defendant A's defense counsel not timely filed).
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendants guilty of all the charges of this case (excluding the portion not guilty). Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to admissibility of evidence, universal offense, and duty relation in bribery, etc., by misapprehending the legal principles as to the fact that the Defendants exceeded the bounds of free conviction due to violating the logical and empirical rules.
In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the intention in the Personal Information Protection Act shall not be a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged by the defendant B as the ground for appeal or by the court below as the subject of judgment ex officio.
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.