임금
1. The Defendant: (a) 28,403,845 won to Plaintiff A; (b) 13,329,173 won to Plaintiff B; (c) 12,429,356 won to Plaintiff C; and (d) 8,537.
1. The facts following the facts of recognition are recognized as either a dispute between the parties or in full view of the entries in Gap evidence 1-1-6 and the whole purport of the pleadings.
A. The Plaintiffs were employed by ENP Co., Ltd., a newspaper publishing company. Plaintiffs A was from December 23, 2007 to October 31, 2017; Plaintiff B was from April 1, 2008 to October 31, 2017; Plaintiff C was from March 12, 2013 to October 31, 2017; Plaintiff D was from April 1, 2014 to September 31, 207 to September 8, 2017; Plaintiff C was not paid retirement pay to each of the Plaintiffs’ retirement allowances to 300, 360, 37, 206, 37, 208, 206, 300, 37, 205, 205, 205, 2036, 319, 205, 205, 205, 317, 2015.
3. However, the remaining balance of the retirement allowance claim after the payment of KRW 16,000,000 after the plaintiff Eul is paid KRW 13,329,170, and the remaining balance of the retirement allowance claim after the payment of KRW 5,000 after the plaintiff Eul is KRW 3,728,364.
B. On January 11, 2018, U.S. District Court 2017Hahap504 declared bankrupt against the said corporation, and the Defendant was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy.
2. The allegations and judgment of the parties
A. The Defendant, who is the bankruptcy trustee, sought the payment of retirement allowance claim and damages for delay from the day immediately following the date bankruptcy is declared.
B. The bankruptcy procedure against the above corporation is in progress, and the bankruptcy claim listed in the creditor list has the same effect as a final and conclusive judgment, and thus, the bankruptcy procedure becomes final and conclusive and conclusive and the repayment is received through the distribution procedure.
Nevertheless, the demand for a separate lawsuit is only a repetition of the following procedures.