When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant operated a commercial sex trafficking business establishment with the trade name “C” in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 2112, advertised the above business establishment on the Internet “D” et al. and employed E et al. as female employees.

From July 18, 2014 to July 29, 2014, the Defendant received 60,000 won for 80,000 won from male customers in the name of the person who found the said officetel from the above officetels, and had female employees E, etc. do the act of similarity, such as restricting the sexual organ of customers by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographs and outputs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order do not have any record of punishment, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the same reason, considering the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and other factors of sentencing as shown in the oral argument, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., as long as the punishment is determined as above.