1. Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules,

In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below did not recognize mental disorder is erroneous, and it is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground for appeal by the defendant and the respondent for attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") as the ground for appeal or by the court below as the subject of judgment ex officio.

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

2. With respect to a case for which a request for attachment order is made, if the defendant files a final appeal against the case for which the request for attachment order is filed, the final appeal shall be deemed filed.

However, there is no entry of reasons in the petition of appeal and there is no entry of reasons for objection in the appellate brief.

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.