Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On September 20, 2015, at around 06:20, the Defendant: (a) heard that the Defendant requested the victim E (34 tax) to move the vehicle of the Defendant parked in the market log in front of the “D” restaurant located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do; and (b) sought the victim’s desire to talk to his wife, who is in accordance with the victim E (34 tax). The Defendant expressed that the victim “I will come to me to me, because I would come to me,” and the victim expressed three times the victim’s bath to her hand, and continued her face to go to her face while taking one hand. This led to the assault, the Defendant sawd the victim with a light that requires two weeks’s treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol (two times) made to E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of two copies of damaged parts, on-site photographs, and one CD-1 statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 262, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant, at the time and place of the above facts charged, faced with the victim’s neck by the two hand, and caused the victim to face on three occasions, and had the victim undergo a two-day medical treatment. In addition, the Defendant got into the cryp and the cryp scopic coordinate.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, namely, ① The CD verification result of this court is confirmed only when the defendant and the victim are faced with their body in and around the situation where the defendant and the victim face each other, and it is difficult to confirm the situation where the defendant are faced with their body, such as the above facts charged, and ② The defendant also has a consistent relation with the victim since the investigative agency to this court, but there is a change to the purport that there is no difference between the victim and the victim. ③ The victim is an investigative agency and the victim.