The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that the modified facts charged were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding “transfer” under Article 49(4)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

In addition, the argument that the court below erred in violation of Article 51 of the Criminal Act in sentencing is the argument of unfair sentencing. According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in the case where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, the argument that the sentencing of the sentence is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.