Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

"2015 High 1191"

1. On May 16, 2015, at around 10:30 on May 16, 2015, the Defendant was accommodated with the victim C (n, 52 years of age) located in Suwon-gu, Busan (n, 52 years of age) 302, and then slicked with the above women, resulting in the slick-up dispute with the above women, 203 customers are slick, slick-phones are the victim, and the Defendant slick-phones are 3 stories (302) and slicked with the victim.

Accordingly, the victim’s 302 personal phonephones “Isson”

“The victim’s duties were obstructed by force by force, such as: (a) the Defendant, after diving, fledd with the Defendant; (b) the Defendant followed panty, returned to the third floor; and (c) repeated opening of the door 302 door through several times; and (d) repeated opening of approximately 10 minutes of the door 302 door door and repeated opening of the door, thereby obstructing the victim’s duties.

2. At around 14:00 on May 16, 2015, the Defendant recommended the victim’s husband to leave the room by setting the time of the victim’s leaving the room. However, without opening the door, the Defendant saw the victim to “sprinking to sprink the spons, spons,” and the victim sponsed the 302 sealphone to 302 and reported to the police when the victim wants to leave the room without leaving the door.

"A defect," "Cals, and the same year," were cut off by telephone while taking a desire to do so.

이에 피해 자가 경찰에 신고 하자, 피고인은 신고를 했다는 이유로 302호 출입문을 발로 차고 주먹으로 치며 " 내가 뭘 잘못 했노, 씨발 년 아, 내가 민락동 골목시장 깡패다

"To be called, approximately twenty-five minutes of virtual force interfered with the victim's work."

Around September 23, 2015, the Defendant was a driver of a vehicle in the E Spo area, and was under the influence of at least 0.157% of alcohol during blood in around 05:57 on September 23, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle up to approximately 2 km at the entrance of the port of the tunnel of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government, Busan Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the defendants;