If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On January 29, 2018, at around 22:20, the Defendant was dissatisfied with a taxi engineer in front of the Incheon Western Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu Police Station in front of the main station of the Incheon Seo-gu Police Station, which was reported on January 29, 2018, and was urged by the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the above police station D branch of the police station, dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112, the Defendant died of this Chewing trees.

“Inducing “,” and assaulting the part of the E Gyeong Park on two occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is a second assault against the police officer dispatched after receiving a report that the defendant wraped with a taxi engineer on two occasions. In light of the circumstances of the crime, the degree of assault, etc., the nature of the crime does not be light.

In order to establish the legal order, crimes that obstruct the legitimate performance of police officers' duties are recognized to require strict punishment.

However, the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects his mistake.

The damaged police officers want to find the Defendant the Defendant.

The defendant has no record of criminal punishment after he/she was sentenced to a fine due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in 1989.

In full view of the conditions of sentencing as shown in the trial process of this case, such as the character, conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as indicated in the Disposition shall be determined.