However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 00:07 on April 15, 2013, the Defendant had 75,000 won in total of the market price owned by the victim in front of other calculations, i.e., 150 tin lottery tickets at around 00:07.

From then on March 2014, the Defendant stolen a total of approximately 1,273,00 won of the market price owned by the victims, such as the list of offenses, from around 13 times in total, as shown in the list of offenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and C

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One month to nine years of imprisonment;

2. Scope of the recommended sentences for the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] thie-general larceny [the scope of the recommended sentence and the scope of the recommended sentence] mitigated area (one to six months of imprisonment] (one to six months of imprisonment] mitigated area: None of the following persons:

3. The decision of sentence shall be made within the scope of the recommended sentence, taking into account the fact that the defendant's error is divided and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and that the amount of damage in this case is only 1.2 million won, etc.