However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 22, 2020, the Defendant, at a restaurant located in the Changwon city on October 22, 2020, and “masts wishing to drink and dry drinking expenses.”

“The police officer, who was called upon the report of 112, recommended to return home from C to the police officer belonging to the Changwon Police Station B of the Changwon Police Station B of the Republic of Korea, but did so, disregarding this, and obscing other customers, and showing the attitude of doing harm to the police officer, he saw C to put his arms from C, and assaulted the police officer, such as: “The 112th of the Changwon Police Station B of the Changwon Police Station, I am kn-kn-kn-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (including the reflective fact, the same criminal record and the fact that there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;