except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

1. On April 26, 2014, at around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) took a 112 report that a drunk woman was used on the road in Busan City’s thought-gu; and (b) took a bath view that the police officer’s patrol force of the E District Party, who was called “I am going to know how I am going to go to am to am to am to am to am to am to the patrol,” instead, I am to “I am to go to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to the said F; and (c) am to am to am to am to am to the said F’s head, and interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officer on the duty of report by the police officer on the 112 report of the said vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, F, and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the criminal place

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing criteria [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties shall be the category 1 (the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties).

2. The portion dismissing the prosecution in consideration of the following facts: (a) the confession of the sentence of punishment is determined and the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is not relatively much severe; (b) the Inspector F also desires to take the Defendant’s wife against the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant was punished by a fine not exceeding 100,000 won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act in 1

1. On April 26, 2014, from around 01:25 to around 01:35, the Defendant, on the grounds that he arrested himself as a flagrant offender in the E-district located in Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, he publicly insultingd the victims of the instant G, who was the victim F, and F, and F, Assistant I, on the job where the parents, etc. of the said G were located, to “the victim who would be flick at the singing room before the ice. He will do so at the singing room.”

2. We examine the judgment, which falls under Article 311 of the Criminal Act.