If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

At around 06:40 on May 4, 2013, the Defendants: (a) reported the Defendants’ physical fighting along with other daily behaviors, and (b) requested the victims to go to another place; and (c) the Defendants attempted to go to go to another place, and (d) the victims wanted to go to go to the other place, the Defendants told the Defendants to “Isk to go to go to the past.”

At this time, Defendant A, who is the same kind of conduct, expressed the desire to "Yolk Yolk YYYY YY YYY YYY YYY YY YYYY YYY YYY YYYYY YYY YYYYY YYY YYYY YYY YYY YYYY

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the 14-day catum catum, which requires medical treatment on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. The police statement of G and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. and Punishment of Specific Crimes, Article 2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above, each of the provisional payment orders;