On April 1, 2009, the Defendant stated that “The victim C, who became aware of in the process of preparing for the apartment project, will win 100% of the trust proceeds of the F apartment constructed in Ulsan-gu D, Ulsan-gu, and will win 7 billion won of the trust proceeds when winning the case. In addition, the Defendant will not only receive a refund of KRW 1.5 billion of the road construction contribution paid at Ulsan-gu, but also there are school sites within the said new apartment site, and there are many profits in the said new apartment site, which will be expected to be newly constructed. It is now necessary for trial costs and living costs, etc. to lend money.”

However, the facts are not only the probability of winning the lawsuit but also the winning of the lawsuit in the above lawsuit.

Even if the price of the land accrued to the non-indicted G, the owner of the land in relation to the above apartment building, was to be paid to the above G, and there was no money that the defendant could receive, and even if the above road construction contributions were to be paid, there was no money that the defendant could receive, as it would be attributed to the land trust in Korea. The above school site is actually owned by the above G, and the defendant does not have any right to the above site, and the urban planning should be modified in order to newly construct the apartment building as well as the cost thereof, and there was no intention or ability to newly construct it as approximately KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.