When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

피고인은 2016. 1. 25.경부터 2016. 7. 5.경까지 서울 강남구 B에 있는 C 오피스텔 810호를 임차하여 마사지실 3개를 설치하고 ‘D’ 등 인터넷 사이트에 “G스팟케어와 시오후키의 명가, 투샷 1만원 추가” 등 성매매를 암시하는 광고를 게재한 다음 위 광고를 보고 찾아온 E 등 남성들로부터 성매매대금 14만 원 가량을 받고 F 등 여성들이 대기하고 있는 마사지실로 안내하여 F 등 여성들로 하여금 나체로 E 등 남성들의 성기를 손으로 잡아 흔드는 등 유사성교하게 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic materials related to crackdown;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The punishment of imprisonment and a fine shall be concurrently imposed pursuant to Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (the punishment shall be imposed in determining the fact that the accused has operated the business in this case for a long time);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;