마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
One (Evidence No. 2) and 24 (Evidence No. 3) for disposables, which have been seized vinyl.
Punishment of the crime
Although the Defendant, “2017 Highest 6446,” was not a handler of narcotics, the Defendant treated the Mepter (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) of a local mental medicine as follows.
1. On September 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) put in a one-time injection machine of QG L L, located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P on September 8, 2017; and (b) injected it in a single-time injection machine; and (c) used it as a raw water; and (d) administered it in a way of injecting it.
2. On September 14, 2017, the Defendant administered philophones (i.e., one minute, approximately 0.03g in ordinary) in the same manner as the description in paragraph 1 of the same Article at the same place as in paragraph (1) of the same Article.
3. On the same day as Paragraph 2, the Defendant carried approximately 0.45 g of philophones in vinyl at the same place as Paragraph 1, at around 14:30 on the same day, and carried them at the bottom of the display site.
"2017 Highest 8847"
1. On January 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered into a loan agreement with the victim for the purpose of purchasing RE220 bents car at the Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, in order to purchase the passenger car at the NAK Savings Bank; (b) around 48 months in 1,205 and 560 won per month; and (c) took out a loan of KRW 39 million per month with the mortgagee for the purpose of equally distributing the amount; and (d) on February 1, 2016, the Defendant set up a mortgage on the said passenger car as “the mortgagee Savings Bank, the mortgagee A, the mortgagee A, and the bond value of KRW 39 million.”
On November 2016, 2016, the Defendant borrowed 15 million won from the person who was killed in the name (T) through a used car with a used car at the fluor of the land at the fluor, and the Defendant could not grasp the location of the said car as security.
Accordingly, the defendant concealed the above car which was the object of the victim's mortgage and interfered with the victim's exercise of mortgage.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of Uuer XG car.
Automobiles which are not covered by mandatory insurance.