도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 13 million.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On August 11, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 4 million to the Suwon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On December 23, 2005, a summary order of KRW 1 million to the same crime in the same court on December 23, 2005, and a summary order of KRW 700,000 as the same crime in the same court on May 17, 2002.
【Criminal Facts】
On January 3, 2020, at around 02:44, the Defendant driven a D SP car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.154% while under the influence of alcohol from the 1km section to the underground parking lot of the C Apartment at the time of harmony.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A report on the actual state of the driver;
1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;
1. Before judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports, and application of summary order-related Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, despite the fact that the defendant had been subject to punishment several times due to drunk driving, and the fact that the blood alcohol level is high, etc., are disadvantageous to the defendant, while the defendant recognizes the crime and seriously reflects the fact that the defendant does not have any traffic accident, the criminal records of the above drunk driving are punished by a fine, and two of them are old in 202 and 2005, and two of them are old in 202, and 2 of them are old in 2005, and there are no other serious criminal records, and the fact that there are some other circumstances that might be taken into account in the course of driving, shall be considered as favorable to the defendant, and it is decided as per Disposition by taking into account all other