However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 18, 2016, the Defendant, at around 22:25, 2016, on the street before the “C pharmacy” located in Seo-gu, Seogu, Daegu, and had been working as a base for the prevention of traffic accidents, provided the Defendant with a view to leaving the window of the patrol to E, and the police officer with no reason, without any reason. The Defendant asked the police officer whether the said police officer would be off from the patrol car, and whether the “IXE,” the police officer, was the head of the police station, who was working as a base for the prevention of traffic accidents;

(1) The head of Si/Gun/Gu stated that the head of Si/Gun/Gu, upon having expressed his/her desire to be able to see, the head of Si/Gun/Gu, the head of Si/Gun/Gu, and the head of Si/Gun/Gu, the head of Si/Gun

F Assaultd twice by drinking the breast part of the F. F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (i.e., the degree of assault and the fact that there is no previous conviction);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;