A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B, and Defendant F shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, respectively.

Defendant

A is a person who operates the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. M., and a victim company requested the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.P (hereinafter referred to as the "victim company") to make a car hedge, which is entrusted by the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and the victim company completed the gold and gold-type test (hereinafter referred to as the "gold, etc.").

Defendant

A requested to supply the completed gold-type, etc. to the victim company, but it does not supply the cost of production of gold-type, etc. and the amount receivable before being paid by the victim company first.

The Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. has failed to deliver gold-type pilot products until August 25, 2016, which is the date of payment to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. and the due date for postponed payment.

Accordingly, Defendant A could have caused damage to Defendant C, etc. due to the failure to supply gold, etc. in time, and ordered Defendant C, etc. to find the victim company to steal the gold type, etc. according to Defendant A’s instructions. Defendant C, etc. collected employees in accordance with Defendant A’s instructions and recruited the victim company by dividing the victim company into one’s own vehicle and finding the victim company in writing.

1. The Defendants jointly committed the crime (special larceny) by the Defendants, together with Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AAB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AH, AI, AJ, AK, AK, and AL (Suspension of Prosecution) around August 25, 2016, caused Defendant D to be loaded in the victim company located in Daegu-gu AM, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and loaded gold-types in order to make any clerical error. On August 25, 2016, the Defendants loaded the Defendant D’s 2 chemicals, NN 2 chemicals, AO, Korea-U, Korea-U.

Defendant

D and R entered the victim company to the AP, who is an employee of the victim company, requested a pro rata test, but refused, so the defendant C was informed of the fact by telephone, and the defendant A, the defendant C et al. entered the victim company by driving the car with others.

Accordingly, the employees of the victim company, including AP, have locked the door of gold-type withdrawal workplace.