1. On June 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 13:00 on the first day of 13:00, the Defendant: (b) livedd with a monthly tenant under 305 of the Dabudio 305 operated by the Victim C, which was installed therein; (c) cut off with one LGED TV equivalent to KRW 300,000,000, and one small air conditioners equivalent to the market price of 2.50,000 won.

2. The Defendant, around 08:00 on June 17, 2015, stayed due to employment in the victim FF in Pyeongtaek-si, 303, the LE TV equivalent to 200,000 won at the market price, which was owned by the victim of the damage in the head of Pyeongtaek-si, was stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Determination on the application of the sentencing guidelines to the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act from among concurrent offenders: The scope of recommending the sentencing guidelines to the applicable O: consideration of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the basic area (6 to 16 months) of the theft of general property has not been recovered from damage caused by O in the basic area (6 to 6 months).