On May 25, 2015, the above case showed that E, the owner of the building, did not settle the deposit promptly to F, the tenant of the dong interest in F, the tenant of the building, at around 19:00, the case was assaulted by C, 2:3 times by pushing the chest part of E, and the defendant did not seem to have been in the above site, and the situation was not even in fact, and C does not seem to have been continuing at the above site, and C tried to stop the front of E over several times, cut off the street, and pushed back by E on the wind.

Nevertheless, the defendant's defense counsel's "at the whole face of the two people's dispute" is hot.

“In the examination of “, from the beginning to the end of the course of the examination”, I examine “I”.

“At the end of the Hague”, and “Chrhrhrhrhrhrhrhrhrh

The testimony was made in the newspaper “I,” and “I, e.g., whether two people have a big physical contact and not in this situation,” and “I, e.g., memory in the newspaper “I do not have any physical contact.”

“In conclusion, whether Defendant and E did not have any special physical contact

In the newspaper "," "I do not have any example, whether or not I have any physical contact with almost 2 others."

“The testimony was made.”

계속하여 피고인은 검사의 “ 그러면 본 건 뭡 니 까” 라는 신문에, “ 아, 따라다녔죠

The testimony "I am close to I am close to I am, I am " I am am," and "I am close to I am am,"

(1) The width of the front is crypted

“I have not interfered with” in the newspaper “I have not so far.”

(b) Dubling, not on the balm, on the balm, cut off, balp, and balp, not on the balm;

“ at that time”.