도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the following: (a) the gist of the grounds for appeal is confessions and reflects by the Defendant; (b) the Defendant’s act of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act as a basic recipient of the base is not good under economic circumstances; (c) the Defendant’s health status is at the location to support the aged 87 who is not good; and (d) the Defendant’s act of not re-offending in the future, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the crimes of this case is that the Defendant drives a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.226% without obtaining a driver's license, and transfers the passbook, cash card, and password under the name of the Defendant for consideration, and the case is not less complicated. In the past, the Defendant has the past history of punishing the Defendant for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the Road Traffic Act, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement), and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (five times of imprisonment, five times of suspended sentence, two times of suspended sentence of imprisonment, and four times of fine). In particular, the Defendant did not have any further record of the Defendant's punishment and the effect of the Defendant's punishment on April 18, 2013 due to the completion of the enforcement of the above sentence on October 15, 2013, considering the following circumstances, it is difficult to expect the Defendant's each of the above crimes and the circumstances of the Defendant's punishment.
3...