beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.29 2014고단2882

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be postponed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Sungnam branch of Suwon District Court on August 9, 201, and a fine of KRW 1.0 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Sungnam branch of Suwon District Court on March 8, 2012.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BP car.

On October 23:30, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.131%, and started from the road near Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and came to the vicinity of 341 Gambri-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, the Defendant started from the roads near the 3th Gambri-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and opened the e-mail tunnel room near the 3th national road E1 charging station, which was driven along the two-lanes of the road, without thoroughly examining the electric direction, and started by negligence, found the e-mail vehicle driven by the victim C, which was in the atmosphere of the signal in the front bank, late, and moved to the said vehicle, but failed to avoid the collision, and led to the e-frequency vehicle of the victim C with the front direction of the signal immediately preceding part of the vehicle.

The Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim G, who is the same passenger of the same vehicle as the victim C due to the foregoing occupational negligence for two weeks each time, such as fluoral salt in need of treatment, and fluoral salt in need of two weeks each time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Each written statement of C, G, and E;

3. Reports on traffic accidents;

4. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

5. Each written diagnosis;

6. Previous records of judgment: The application of criminal records, repeated statements, and statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences and the choice of punishment.