(a) an indication of the Appendix No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15;

A. The Plaintiff owns 2/3 shares, and the Defendant owns 1/3 shares, respectively, among the real estate of this case (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking the division of the instant real estate since there was no agreement on the division of the instant real estate between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the result of appraisal by the head of the Korea Land Information Corporation and the head of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. 1) According to the above basic facts, one of the co-owners of the instant land may file a claim against the Defendant, who is another co-owner, for partition of the instant land pursuant to Article 268(1) of the Civil Act. 2) In light of the aforementioned evidence and the overall purport of pleadings, the most reasonable method of partition of the instant land is as follows: 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,10,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 43, 44, 45, 36, 36, 47, 47, 48, 49, 46, 36, 47, 47, 49, 46, 250, 27, 364, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 46, 57, 57, 54, 146.

3. According to the conclusion, the instant real estate is divided in accordance with the Disposition No. 1.