2. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim is dismissed.

3...

A. On October 4, 2006, Plaintiff A received a promissory note with a face value of KRW 350 million,00,000,000 from G issued by G, and the same day was notarized by Nonparty F, who received a promissory note with a face value of KRW 350,000,000,000,000,000,000 from G. (2) On June 21, 2012, Plaintiff B prepared a monetary loan contract for lending KRW 350,00,000,000,000,000,000 from G and notarized.

3) On July 20, 2010, Plaintiff C received a payment order to the effect that “G shall pay KRW 600 million to Plaintiff C and delay damages therefor.” The payment order became final and conclusive on September 25, 2010, Plaintiff D received from Suwon District Court on October 28, 2011, payment order to the effect that “G and H shall jointly pay KRW 15 million to Plaintiff D and its delay damages.” The said payment order became final and conclusive on November 22, 2011.

5) From the Gyeyang Branch of Suwon District Court on January 19, 2012, Plaintiff E received a payment order to the effect that “G shall pay Plaintiff E the amount of KRW 50 million and delay damages therefor,” and the said payment order was finalized on March 7, 2012. (b) G filed a lawsuit against Plaintiff B, Seoul Southern District Court 2008Gadan61909, and the said court received a settlement recommendation to the effect that “I and J shall jointly and severally pay KRW 52 million and the amount of KRW 24% per annum from March 1, 2007 to the date of full payment.”

2) According to the above final settlement recommendation decision, G applied for a compulsory auction on the real estate owned by G to the Seoul Southern District Court, and on December 28, 2009, the dividends claim claim amounting to be distributed to K by the Seoul Southern District Court on Seoul Southern District Court (hereinafter “instant dividends claim”).

B transferred to the Plaintiff B, and the Defendant on December 28, 2009.