구상금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to Defendant A and B, jointly and severally KRW 95,283,953 and KRW 91,176,545 among them, b.
Between the Plaintiff and the Defendant C, D, and E, the facts constituting “the cause of claim” in the attached Form No. 1 and No. 10 can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings, and between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A and B, it is deemed that the said Defendants led to confession pursuant to Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act
According to the above facts, the defendants are obligated to pay the amount of indemnity and the damages for delay as claimed by the plaintiff.
Defendant C, D, and E protested to the effect that their inheritance to the network F is qualified, and thus, they do not bear the above indemnity liability.
In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 1 of the evidence No. 1, as a whole, as F left the Defendant C, son, Defendant D, and Defendant E, his father, who is the spouse, on July 2, 2013, died, the above Defendants filed a report on qualified acceptance of inheritance with respect to netF under the Daejeon Family Court’s Incheon Branch Branch Branch Office 2013Modan995, 201, and filed a report on qualified acceptance of inheritance on September 4, 2013 by the above court. Thus, the above Defendants’ inheritance with respect to F shall be deemed as qualified acceptance.
However, in case of qualified acceptance of inheritance, the existence and scope of the inheritance obligation are determined as it is, and its liability is limited to the scope of the inherited property, so the defendants' defenses based on the premise that the inheritance obligation is extinguished are
(2) The plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case against the defendants of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.