When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

As the representative director of the D in Ulsan-gu, the Defendant is a person in charge of overall management of the business affairs of the said company. E is a person who conducts business management consulting, application for various national subsidies, etc. under the trade name of “G” in Article 602 of the F building 602 in Busan-dong, Busan-gu, and H is a person employed by E to assist in the business affairs of G.

In order to promote the employment of the aged who are difficult to find employment or change their occupation, the Republic of Korea grants a certain amount of subsidy, i.e., subsidies for extension of employment of the aged, in proportion to the number of the aged who continue to work according to the abolition or extension of the retirement age.

In addition to the above E, the Defendant: (a) abused the fact that a public official in charge of granting subsidies for employment extension of the elderly is aware of the repeal of retirement age and the extension of retirement age based solely on the documents submitted by submitting the rules of employment, etc. with evidentiary data on the requirements for payment; (b) received the above subsidies by submitting the rules of employment as if he either extended retirement age or abolished retirement age by falsely preparing and submitting the rules of employment as if he abolished; (c)

Accordingly, the above E falsely establishes the Rules of Employment D (State) of January 1, 2009, which provides for the retirement age as of January 1, 2006, when the retirement age was extended from 55 to 60 years of age on January 1, 2009 by D (State) at the office office on June 1, 201, while the defendant puts a seal and seal of the employee representative and the user representative under the above Rules of Employment, and made the above Rules of Employment D (State) of January 1, 2009, which provides that the retirement age was extended from 55 to 60 years of age on January 1, 2006 when the retirement age was extended from 55 to 50 years of age, and the above Rules of Employment was falsely made on January 1, 2009 when the defendant took charge of the above Rules of Employment Support Center employees on the same day, and made a false application for the retirement age as above.