구상금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A’s KRW 2,925,328 and KRW 1,030,433 among them shall be from December 6, 2017 to January 26, 2018.
1. Each fact in the separate sheet concerning the cause of the claim is without dispute between the parties or can be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire pleadings as set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including a Serial number). Thus, barring any special circumstance, defendant A shall pay to the plaintiff 2,925,328 won (=20,47,299 won in total) x 3/21 inherited shares x 1,030,433 won (i.e., the balance of principal subrogated 7,213,033 x 3/21 x 3/1000 in total 26% in total) from the day after December 6, 2017 to the day after delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case x 12% in total 9% in total, 25% in total, 30% in total, 95% in total, 30% in total in total, 29% in total, 36% in total in total, and 9.
2. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J, Defendant B, D, E, E, F, G, H, I, and J filed a special declaration of approval with the head of the Gwangju Family Court on January 12, 2018, and the said declaration was accepted on February 23, 2018.
According to the above facts, Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J are liable for the performance of the obligation of indemnity against the said Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the network K. Thus, the aforementioned Defendants’ defense pointing this out has merit.
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant A is justified.