beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.02.14 2017가합50767

해고무효확인

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 142,495,400 as well as 20% per annum from October 20, 2017 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is the party to the contract established with the purpose of receiving deposits and installment savings from union members, lending to union members, mutual aid business, etc. The plaintiff is a person who entered the defendant on March 12, 1984 and has been on duty since June 2010.

B. On March 12, 2015, the Defendant held a regular board of directors on March 11, 2015, and issued a personnel order following the Plaintiff’s return of the Plaintiff. On March 11, 2015, the Defendant passed a resolution of disciplinary action against the Plaintiff for suspension of one month of suspension from office and 13,934,50 won due to the lack of capital budget and acquisition procedures for real estate for business purposes, appointment of employees, unfair compilation and execution of budget, and large cash transaction report, and notified the Plaintiff of the order of suspension of office. In addition, the Defendant held a regular board of directors on the same day, and decided to dismiss the Plaintiff as the Defendant’s manager and the working-level manager and the working-level manager. 2) The Defendant reinstated the Plaintiff to the expiration of the disciplinary period on April 16, 2015.

On June 1, 2015, the following one month after the Defendant issued a personnel order to the Plaintiff as a person in charge of the collection of special bonds (hereinafter referred to as “personnel order on June 1, 2015”), and on October 27, 2015, the Defendant issued a personnel order to the Plaintiff as a person in charge of the collection of special bonds.

(hereinafter “Order of Personnel Management of October 27, 2015”) C.

On March 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) held a board of directors on March 9, 2016 and resolved a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff for the following reasons; (b) notified the Plaintiff on March 21, 201, of “a disciplinary measure taken against the Plaintiff as of March 22, 2016.”

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action.” In compliance with each of the grounds for disciplinary action, the term “the grounds for the disciplinary action” as set out below, and when specific details are followed, the term “the grounds for the disciplinary action” as set out below is added to the number stated in the “specific contents” as set out below. The term “the grounds for the disciplinary action” as set forth in Article 1.