Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is elected as the 113 representative representative of the 6th tenant representative of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and a public announcement of the election of the representative of each apartment.

5. The revised facts charged as of November 12, 2014, include the “management rules item (k)”, but this is a letter of public notice of the election of the representative for each Dong (election district).

5. Inasmuch as it is apparent that the words k. item is wrong, it is corrected to recognize the facts of crime.

(If the details of the application for candidate are different from facts or are found to be disqualified for the same representative even after the election, it is required to submit academic background and career matters based on the fact that the election of the representative is revoked, but it is not submitted even after the deadline, and it is notified by the apartment election commission of the invalidation of the election, and it is issued a decision to revoke the election.

1. On March 27, 2013, at around 18:28, the Defendant destroyed by arbitrarily removing a notice of invalidation of the same representative election against the Defendant, which was attached by the chairman of the above apartment management committee, the victim, from the above apartment 113 elevator.

2. On March 28, 2013, at around 16:16, the Defendant destroyed by arbitrarily removing and smelling a notice of invalidation of the same representative election against the Defendant, which was attached by the chairman of the said apartment management committee, at the same place as the above 1.

3. On April 23, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the victim’s council of occupants by force, such as: (a) in the meeting room for the representative of the occupants of the above apartment; (b) asserting that the Defendant’s qualification as the representative of the apartment is valid; (c) and (d) making the microphone in which the victim D is using; and (d) making the large noise.

4. On April 26, 2013, the Defendant, at the conference room for the representatives of the occupants of the above apartment building on April 26, 2013, asserted that the Defendant’s qualification as the representative of the apartment building was valid and sounded by force, and citing micros in use by the victim D and making great noise.