A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

1. In order to commit telecommunications financing fraud using the so-called “Sishing” method, the Defendants’ role sharing and the name in the public-private partnership is a person in charge of providing an account for remittance of the amount of damage acquired through “Sishing” through lighting staff D, etc., and of soliciting persons who withdraw and deliver the amount of the transferred damage and instruct them to withdraw and deliver the money in cash.

Defendant

A In order to offer and deliver the money received from Bosing damage from Bosing from D during the period from May 2015 to July 2015, A would offer KRW 1.5 million from the 1.5 million won to the 1.5 million from the 1.5 million from the 1.

Upon receiving the proposal to the effect that “,” and accepting it, Defendant B and E accepted the proposal to the same effect as D, and Defendant B and E accepted it, the Defendants and E were in charge of the withdrawal and delivery of the amount of damage incurred by “Sishing”.

As such, the Defendants conspired to commit the telecommunications financing fraud by taking charge of their respective roles together with name-free boxes, D, E, etc.

2. In order to prepare an account to be used for committing a telecommunications financing fraud under the above instruction of the Defendants A, Defendant A contacted Defendant B with each other and transmitted the account number in his name and cell phone numbers to D.

On July 17, 2015, at a place where it is impossible to identify the location of the victim on July 17, 2015, the name-free person is a phone call to the victim F and check whether the account of the head of the Tong is the accomplice or the victim is the accomplice.

When the Supreme Prosecutors' Office enters his personal information, contact information, workplace, etc. on the site of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, and transfers money to the virtual account of the Prosecutor's Office, it will be returned after investigation.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the victim's account was not a prosecutor, and the victim's account was a crime.