However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant has been living with a female-friendly Gu problem while drinking alcohol and driving it.

On March 9, 2019, at around 02:48, the Defendant: (a) driven a ice car at approximately 2 km section from the front of the coast guard box located in Nam-gu B at the time of port to the front of the port patrol box at the same time, with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.146%, from around 2km section to the road in front of the port guard box at the same time; (b) was able to drive the ice car at the above patrol box, unlike the Defendant’s desire, to control the drinking and recover the vehicle and not arrest the vehicle; and (c) around 04:0 on the same day, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at approximately 3km section from the front of the above patrol box at the port guard, which was located in the port guard station located in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to the parking lot located in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The notification of the results of regulating drinking driving, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the report on the circumstantial statements of each drinking driver;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018) (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018) that provides for the pertinent provision on criminal facts and for the selection of punishment for a crime [Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (it shall be taken into consideration the fact that a person commits an error, a fine for a drunk driving, or a fine for a drunk driving, or the fact that there

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;