When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months for special bodily injury at the Changwon District Court, and the sentence became final and conclusive on September 21, 2017.

On March 29, 2017, around 16:40, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the above court No. 2017 group No. 127 of the lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff B against the Defendant C, and then visited the community service center to obtain a certificate of seal impression for real estate sale.

“To answer the question of the Plaintiff’s agent.”

“The answer was made.”

However, the defendant was individually visiting the community service center and received a certificate of personal seal impression for real estate sale in B as an agent.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against each part of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecutor with respect to B;

1. Recording notes of the examination of witness;

1. Answer to a request for fact-finding;

1. A certificate of hospitalization;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of one copy (No. 6 No. 5 of the evidence list) of a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and a copy of the judgment;

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act that selects a punishment;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict punishment as an offense endangering a legitimate judgment by impairing the court’s substantial truth finding, and even if the defendant shows an attitude to avoid liability while denying the crime, it is disadvantageous to the defendant. However, the defendant’s perjury does not relate to important matters of the claim for the above purchase and sale, but the defendant’s perjury is not the result of the judgment in the above case.