However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:00 on June 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) raised an objection against corrosion on the part of the owner of the vessel at the bed room of the Defendant located in Section 4 of Jeju-dong, Jeju-do; (b) the Defendant raised an objection against corrosion on the part of the owner of the vessel at the bed room of the Defendant; (c) the Defendant raised an objection against corrosion on the part of the owner of the vessel at the bed room of the Defendant; (d) but (e) the Defendant was called as the victim’s D (the age of 61) and Si expenses, but the Defendant did not go beyond several times; but (e) the Defendant collected the excessive (10cm a day, the total length of 20cm) which is a dangerous object that the victim did not go on the back of the vessel.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the photographs of deadly weapons;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do111, Jan. 1, 201

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;