From May 1, 201, the Defendant had been working as an employee after concluding a labor contract with the victimized company in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu and 201 (hereinafter “victim”) from around May 1, 201, and the victimized company was ordinarily engaged in the sale and installation of card terminals, management of affiliated businesses, etc. as an agent of credit card information and communications affiliated businesses [the Do Governor” (hereinafter “PPP”)]. While the Defendant had a duty of care to attract new affiliated businesses from the victimized company and to maintain and manage existing affiliated businesses, it is difficult to recognize that the existing affiliated businesses do not uniformly lose the revenue of the affiliated business entity from the affiliated business entity to the 9th affiliated business entity, stating that the affiliated business entity would lose the revenue of the affiliated business entity from the affiliated business entity to the 8th affiliated business entity without the consent of the affiliated business entity from the affiliated business entity to the “H” of the 9th affiliated business entity by converting the F, the affiliated business entity from the affiliated business entity to the “H” of the 9th affiliated business entity.

Therefore, this part of the facts charged is revised as stated in the facts constituting a crime to the extent that there is no concern about actual disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of the defendant's right of defense (the prosecutor did not specify the amount of property damage suffered by the damaged company due to the defendant's occupational breach of trust as specific amount