공무상요양불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a fire-fighting official on December 5, 1994, and performed the duties of each rescue unit from October 21, 2008 to December 20, 2010, and from February 7, 2012 to July 22, 2012. The Plaintiff performed fire-fighting and first-aid duties during the other period.
B. On December 9, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) diagnosed “pend signboard escape certificate (C3/4/5/6/7); (b) he/she (L4/5); and (c) decided not to approve medical care for official duties on April 11, 2017 on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation between the above branches of official duties on April 27, 2017 between the Defendant and the Defendant on April 11, 2017.
C. On September 19, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) went into effect a light climatic climatic climatic surgery and climatic climatic surgery; and (b) on January 10, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for approval of medical treatment for official duties with the Defendant for re-integating the “pliatory signboard escape certificate (C/4/5/6/7); (c) the climatic signboard escape certificate (L4/5); (d) the climatic cliphal cliphal base, and the tension.”
On March 6, 2018, the Defendant approved the medical treatment for official duties as to “the base and tension of the Mestalin.” However, the Defendant’s “the instant disposition” on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the instant injury and disease, on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the official duties, with respect to “the Mestalical signboard escape certificate (C3/4/5/7), and the Mestical signboard escape certificate (L4/5)” (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”).
E) On August 30, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee. However, on August 30, 2018, the Plaintiff’s request for review was dismissed. [The Plaintiff did not have any dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap’s subparagraphs 1 through 3, and the purport
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion is appointed as a fire-fighting official on December 5, 1994.