A. The Defendant did not assault the police officers, or did not interfere with the disturbance on the patrol boat, such as the statement in the facts charged.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in the erroneous determination of facts, the above argument by the defendant is without merit, since it can be recognized that the police officers dispatched by the defendant after receiving a report as stated in the facts charged are assaulted by the police officers on the patrol car.

B. In full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of the case of unfair sentencing and the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime of the same kind, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per