해고무효확인 등
1. It is confirmed that the Defendant’s dismissal on April 24, 2013 against the Plaintiff was null and void.
2. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 143,713,892.
1. Basic facts
A. On March 7, 1996, the Plaintiff entered the Defendant Company as a member of the Defendant Company, from September 2002 to September 2, 2002, the two team chairperson of the two team chairperson of the Defendant Company’s vessel production 2 group, and requested the procuring department to purchase the materials and tools requested by the production department, and supplied the materials purchased by the procuring department to the supplier, the Plaintiff engaged in the business of inspecting and verifying them.
B. 1) Nonparty C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) that supplies materials and tools to the Defendant Company
D) On February 2013, 2013, the head of the business division of the Defendant Company: (a) defects in the letter of post offer to the effect that “as the representative director E of the Plaintiff and the Nonparty Company conspired to deliver the Defendant Company, to make payments by forging documents, and by dividing the payments with each other,” and (b) the ethical team of the Defendant Company was responsible to the Plaintiff and E on or around March 2013, 2013, based on the above information.” (hereinafter “the letter of confirmation”).
(2) On April 17, 201, the amount recognized by the Plaintiff as the instant applicant was KRW 167,981,00,00 in Switzerland 654EA 74,621,00 and 416EA 93,360,000 in total, and the amount recognized by E is KRW 82,60,00 in Switzerland 724EA 82,601,000 in Switzerland 516E 116,100,000 in total, and KRW 198,701,000 in Switzerland 516EA 116,70,000 in total, as follows, the Defendant Company held a personnel committee on April 23, 2013 as follows, and notified the Plaintiff of dismissal as the grounds for disciplinary action (hereinafter “instant dismissal”). < Amended by Act No. 2423, Apr. 23, 2013>
4. Content of Deliberation: Violation of the Private Rule (Relation to Supply Cost of Group 2 Materials) - From January 2010 to February 2013, the non-party company (representative E) does not supply indirect expendable materials over 31 times in collusion with the Plaintiff, which is the president of the two team for vessel production.