However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 상해 피고인은 2013. 5. 17. 05:35경 원주시 C에 있는 D편의점 앞에서, 술에 취하여 E 쏘울 승용차를 운전하던 중 F이 앞에서 멈칫거린다는 이유로 시비가 되었다.

After that, the Defendant, who is a driver of the above F, laid down the victim G (V, 19 years of age) in bad condition, brought about the victim’s head fright, thereby leaving the victim’s head fright, leading up to approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2013. 5. 17. 05:45경 원주시 C에 있는 원주경찰서 H지구대에 음주운전 혐의로 동행된 후, 위 지구대 소속 경사 I로부터 음주측정을 위하여 인적사항을 확인해 줄 것을 요구받자, 그에게 “씹할 쌔끼야”라고 욕설을 하면서 오른쪽 주먹으로 그의 왼쪽 얼굴을 1회 때려 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on drinking control investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment) concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Du114888

1. Probationary crimes under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;