[Criminal Records] Cases: Cheongju District Court Decision on January 28, 2015: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year: September 16, 2015 / [Criminal Records / [2016 High Court Decision 2058] Case

1. Around 01:00 on April 13, 2016, the Defendant, at the “E” singing room operated by the victim D of the victim D in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and the fourth level, even if the victim was provided with alcohol, alcohol, and alcohol, etc., the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as if the victim had no intent and ability to pay the price; and (b) by deceiving him/her as if he/she were to pay the price, he/she had been provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 260,00

In addition, from December 1, 2015 to May 16, 2016, the Defendant acquired a total of KRW 3,588,800 in property or property gains in total on 27 occasions, such as the written list of crimes, from around December 1, 2015 to around May 16, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving victims, acquired property or property benefits.

2. Larceny;

A. On May 20, 2016, the Defendant found that the victim G was parked on the front road of the Seoul Southernbuk-gu, Seoul, with the front window on May 20, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendant shall put his hand into open windows and take out one mobile phone charging device of 50,000 won of the market price owned by the victim, which is equivalent to 1 million won of the mobile phone owned by the victim, and one mobile phone charging device of 50,000 won of the market price.

They go back.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

B. Around May 22, 2016, the victim I (hereinafter “victim J” appears to be “victim I”’s clerical error, and thus, it is recognized differently ex officio) Defendant cited one S5 mobile phone when the victim I was placed adjacent to the other victim, in the second floor of “L S S Sari” located in K in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. On May 22, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

[2016 High Order 2582] Cases

3. The Defendant is a thief.