except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 201, 201, the Defendant attempted to destroy the instant structure, which was located in the inner and small bottom floor and used as a residence by a person who was on the top of the inner and small bank floor and destroyed the said structure, on the ground that C had delayed in returning home, and that C had delayed in her home, and that C had caused a dispute.”

However, the fire of the blue stop was attempted at the wind that flue in person by taking advantage of drinking water, which was flue onto vinyl plates and flue onto fluor.

Thus, the defendant tried to commit an attempted crime by setting fire to a building which people live.

2. Violence;

A. On October 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) deemed that the Defendant was frightened in a apartment as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, “I ambien, I amben, I amben, I am amben, I amben, I am amben, I amben, I am the victim’s head debt, and assaulted twice.”

B. On July 2013, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s breath with the breath of the apartment, “C,” which is accumulated on the inside of the apartment, “whether it would be the same as or five years to have the width divorced,” and 7 years, at the same time, at the same time.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose the penalty (the point of attempted crime, the choice of limited imprisonment), and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the choice of imprisonment);

1. From among concurrent crimes, Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes within the scope of adding up the long-term punishments of each crime as stated in the punishment determined for the largest building, structure, and attempted crime), among concurrent crimes;

1. Discretionary mitigation of punishment Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “Discretionary Mitigation”), 1.