The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The judgment below

According to the reasoning, the court below determined that the instant insurance contract is valid as long as the defendant obtained the written consent of the deceased at the time of concluding the driver insurance contract with the deceased who was a worker belonging to the defendant as the insured and the beneficiary of his/her own (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”), and that the instant insurance contract due to the death of the deceased belongs to the defendant designated as the beneficiary, not

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the attribution

Other grounds of appeal are with respect to the decision of the court below on the propriety of the family register of the merits, so long as the above decision of the court below is just, the legitimacy of this part of the decision does not affect the conclusion of the judgment, and thus, the grounds of appeal on this point cannot be accepted without further review.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.