공무집행방해등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 17, 2017, the Defendant who damaged property: (a) around 07:00, in front of the victim C’s entry door of the victim’s “Dud club” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; (b) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, installed the locks of the entrance of the instant singing club, which is the victim’s ownership, on several occasions; and (c) damaged the repair cost to KRW 300,000.
2. On September 17, 2017, at the same place as before and after around 07:20 on September 17, 2017, the Defendant was urged to take care of three compacts with which the above C and name are unknown and to take care of drinking, as the Defendant would bring about a 112 report, and was dispatched from the border F of the YY E District of the YE E District, the Defendant was urged to take care of the address.
피고 인은 위 경찰관에게 “ 내가 경찰 너희들을 잘 알지. 너희들이 하는 게 뭔 데 씨 발 새끼, 내가 너희들 다 알아, 개새끼야! ”라고 욕설을 하며 주먹으로 위 경찰관의 가슴을 2회 때리고, 발로 위 경찰관의 무릎을 1회 찼다.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. C’s statement;
1. Photographs photographs of damaged articles, and photographs of damaged parts of the F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report of investigation (related to investigation related to repair cost estimate);
1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized, the damage to the crime of destroying property is minor, the first offender is an agreement with the victim, the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as per the order.