In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

1. On August 2, 2014, at around 21:23, the Defendant: (a) received a report from Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, about 112 that two men are wraped in front of the road of 103 new village No. 4; and (b) obstructed legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of the instant report by a police official who was sent to the police station C District D, Seoul Western Police Station C, which was called out by the Defendant and the Defendant, “I must do so, she must do so, she must do so, she turn off, cut off, and she is hick.” The Defendant d's horse, she is superior, and she pusheds the Defendant, and obstructed the performance of duties by the police official with his/her hand on his/her hand.

2. In relation to Defendant B’s interference with the performance of official duties at the date, time, and place described in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the foregoing D intended to arrest Defendant A as an offender in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an act of crime; (b) arrested Defendant B, in accordance with the same manner, “E shall not be arrested; (c) arrested Defendant 1; (d) arrested Defendant 1; and (d) arrested Defendant 1; and (d) arrested Defendant 1 and her arms and legs for about 10 minutes; and (e) interfered with

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the F’s written statement to the Acts and subordinate statutes (Defendants);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (i.e., selection of fines for negligence, initial crimes and reflectability, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;