In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

1. Defendant A is a person who uses E-private truck as a home delivery employee of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The owner or user of a private-use truck shall not provide or lease such private-use truck commercially for transport of cargo.

Nevertheless, at around 13:55 on January 10, 2018, the Defendant provided private-use trucks for cargo transport at a cost, such as delivering freight under the condition that the name of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul apartment is 900 won per unit to customers.

2. At the time and place of paragraph 1, Defendant B, an employee of the Defendant, provided a private-use truck for transport of cargo at a cost by having A operate the private-use truck for transport of cargo with compensation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. A written statement of the defendant A

1. Control photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of comprehensive details of vehicles;

1. Article 67 subparagraph 7 or Article 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act, the choice of a fine and Defendant B with respect to the facts constituting an offense: Articles 69 (2), 67 subparagraph 7 or 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act, and the choice of a fine;

1. Defendants: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act