When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 06:20 on April 20, 2016, the Defendant destroyed the part of the victim’s urgical part of the repair cost by putting down the urgical part of the land owned by the Defendant into Cheongju-si, on the ground that the victim D used part of the land owned by the Defendant as a passage, on the ground that it was not a passage.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property and harmed its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (ATV photographs attached), CD 1 [The victim has consistently stated in investigative agencies and courts that the front part of the right side of the Atototoba was set up in front of the instant case, and that the repair cost was 100,000 won, and in light of the CD image taken in this case, the facts charged may be admitted.]

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides the following factors: (a) the degree of damage caused by the sentencing is minor; (b) the defendant is old; and (c) the motive and means of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime are revealed in the oral proceedings.