특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복폭행등)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
around July 30, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as an offense of interference with business at the Jeju District Court on September 4, 2014, which received a fine of KRW 1 million as a result of the crime of interference with business from the Jeju District Court on September 4, 2014.
(hereinafter referred to as “previous Incident.” In the previous case, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Head of the Office of General Affairs of the Bank (31 years of age), the Police Assigned for Special Guard F (38 years of age), etc. were subject to criminal punishment by stating the fact of damage at the time of the investigation, and was in mind to find out bank employees.
1. On August 11, 2014, the Defendant found the above bank at around 09:20, and assaulted the victim’s chest at one time, i.e., the victim’s employees, including E, and other customers in name, with whom he/she is the victim, “If he/she is responsible for a fine of 10 million won due to her opening or width, he/she will die in the bank, and if he/she is aware of it, he/she will die in the bank.”
As such, the Defendant threatened E for the purpose of retaliation against the Defendant’s criminal investigation and statement related to his criminal case and trial, and assaulted F, thereby obstructing the victims’ bank services by force.
2. The Defendant: (a) around 13:45, around 13:10 on August 13, 2014; (b) around 14:15 on August 13, 2014; and (c) around 15:5 on September 18, 2014; (b) around 10:30 on September 19, 2014; (c) around 14:40 on September 19, 2014; (d) around 15:10 on September 19, 2014; and (e) around 09:10 on October 7, 2014; and (e) on eight occasions, including around 15:10 on September 19, 2014; and (e) at around 09:10 on October 7, 2014, the Defendant reported that he/she would die the victim E, etc. to be subject to a fine.
As such, the Defendant threatened the victim E with the purpose of retaliationing the Defendant’s criminal investigation and statement related to the Defendant’s criminal case, and at the same time interfered with the Defendant’s bank business by force.
The defendant of "2015 Gohap6" on June 7, 2014 shall be around 19:30.