When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 11:40 on February 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) damaged the victims’ property in order to prevent the opening of each apartment entrance set forth in the victim E-owned No. 101 Dong 102; (b) No. 201 Dong 104, 303 Dong 103, 401 Dong 103, the Defendant damaged the victims’ property by allowing the opening of the apartment entrance set forth in the victim E-owned No. 104; and (c) No. 17,105,00 (the market price of the victim’s assertion).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including the F and G major statements);

1. The third written statement made to F by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the attachment of a estimate of damage to property, a dynamic image accompanied by a dynamic image accompanied by F, a screen photograph accompanied by a screen photo submitted by F, a identification of folding articles conducted by A instructions, an identification of folding articles used at the time of folding, and a report on recording of Reference C telephone statement made by a witness).

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;