If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. [2016 Highest 2544] On November 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) within the E hospital operated by the victim D, who was in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s hospital’s business operation by abusing the truth control in the state of alcohol to make it difficult for the Defendant to take a view that she would visit the hospital after drinking from F of the head of E hospital’s business; (b) among other patients, the Defendant was able to ask the staff of the hospital, such as the above F, to make a statement that she would suffer medical treatment; and (c) the Defendant interfere with the victim’s hospital’s business operation by forcing the employees of the hospital, such as the above F, etc., by having the staff of the hospital receive approximately thirty minutes of 30 minutes of alcohol, and preventing them from doing other business.

2. [Attachment 2016 Highest 2653] On November 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around the reception room of the second floor of the E hospital operated by the victim D, the Cheongju-si Office, the Cheongju-si Office; (b) on the ground that he did not immediately receive the second floor of the E hospital operated by the victim D, while under the influence of alcohol; and (c) on the ground that he had approximately six to eight other outpatients, he would accept the nurse “only a person who has salwlings and money.”

“In large sound, the victim’s operation of the hospital was interfered with by force by taking advantage of force by bringing the disturbance to the victim for about one hour and preventing the said D from performing other duties.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 2544]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Arrest report and investigation report of the occurrence of the case (verification of the operator of the E hospital)

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.